针刺麻醉的研究进展

以下文章来源于小麻哥的日常，作者两只小绵羊

本文由“小麻哥的日常”授权转载

摘要译文（供参考）

1992~2022年针刺麻醉研究动态的文献计量学分析

背景：

针刺麻醉是一项重要的技术发展，1958年起源于中国，20世纪70年代初传入西方，由于其相对新颖性，一直受到人们的密切关注和争论。自20世纪70年代初以来，使用针灸作为阿片类镇痛剂的补充治疗已被接受。针刺麻醉研究有助于减少阿片类药物的临床滥用。但是，只有少数文章关注反映研究趋势、主要研究者、互惠合作和该领域其他信息的先前出版物。有鉴于此，本文运用文献分析的方法，客观地分析了该领域的发展趋势和研究热点，旨在为今后的研究提供依据和参考。

方法：

检索了1992年至2022年间与针灸麻醉相关的出版物。使用CiteSpace和VOSviewer对年度出版物、作者、共引作者及其国家(地区)和机构、共现关键词、突发关键词、共引参考文献和共引期刊进行分析。

结果：

从数据库中检索到746篇符合条件的出版物进行分析，其中637篇文献和109篇综述，并且年度出版物的趋势继续增长。Aashish J.Kumar、Daniel I.Sessler、王宝国和Paul F.White在该领域发表的论文最多(7)，所有作者的中心性都很低(<0.01)。中国(252)和加利福尼亚大学体系(21)分别是最具生产力的国家(地区)和机构，而美国(0.62)和加利福尼亚大学体系(0.16)的中心度最高。去除与搜索策略相关的关键词后，三个最常见的是疼痛(115)、电针(109)和刺激(91)。最近的六个关键词是恢复、经皮穴位电刺激、系统综述、质量、全身麻醉和手术。Wang等人的文章有最高的被引用次数(20)，而Zhang等人的文章具有最高的中心性(0.25)。麻醉和镇痛杂志是最有影响力的杂志(408次共同引用)。

结论：

本研究为针刺麻醉的研究提供了有价值的信息，近年来针刺麻醉研究的前沿课题是促进围手术期的康复、麻醉管理和质量的提高。

原文摘要

Research trends from 1992 to 2022 of acupuncture anesthesia: a bibliometric analysis

Background:Acupuncture anesthesia is a significant technical development that originated in China in 1958 and was introduced to the West in the early 1970s. Due to its relative novelty, it has been the subject of intense scrutiny and contestation. Since the early 1970s, the use of acupuncture as a complementary treatment for opioid analgesics has been accepted. Research on acupuncture anesthesia has helped to reduce clinical opioid abuse. However, only a few articles have focused on previous publications that reflect the trend of the study, the main investigators, reciprocal collaboration, and other information in this field. In view of this, we utilized bibliographic analysis methods to objectively analyze current trends and research hotspots in this field, aiming to provide a foundation and reference for future studies.

Methods:The Web of Science database was searched for publications related to acupuncture anesthesia between 1992 and 2022. The CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to analyze the annual publications, authors, Co-cited authors, and their countries (regions) and institutions, co-occurrence keywords, burst keywords, Co-citation references and Co-citation journals.

Results:A total of 746 eligible publications were retrieved from the database for the analysis, including 637 articles and 109 reviews. And the trend of annual publications continued to grow. Aashish J. Kumar, Daniel I. Sessler, Baoguo Wang, and Paul F. White published the most papers in this field (7), and all authors, had a very low centrality (<0.01). China (252) and the University of California System (21) were the most productive country (region) and institution, respectively, while the United States (0.62) and University of California System (0.16) had the highest centrality. After removing keywords related to the search strategy, the three most frequent were pain (115), electroacupuncture (109), and stimulation (91). The six most recent burst keywords were recovery, transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation, systematic review, quality, general anesthesia, and surgery. Wang et al.'s article had the highest co-citation count (20), whereas Zhang et al.'s articles had the highest centrality (0.25). The Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia was the most influential one (408 co-citations).

Conclusion:  This research provides valuable information for the study of acupuncture anesthesia. In recent years, frontier topics in acupuncture anesthesia research have been the promotion of perioperative rehabilitation, anesthesia management, and quality improvement.

Keywords:CiteSpace; VOSviewer; acupuncture; anesthesia; bibliometric analysis.

免责声明：

本公众平台所刊载原创或转载内容不代表米勒之声的观点或立场。文中所涉及药物使用、疾病诊疗等内容仅供医学专业人士参考。

END

编辑：MiSuper.米超

校对：Michel.米萱 

打赏