申请认证 退出

您的申请提交成功

确定 取消

甲状腺功能亢进症患者围手术期甲状腺危象风险的系统评价

2022-02-07 10:17

甲状腺危象是接受手术的甲状腺机能亢进症患者的一种可怕的并发症。

本文由“罂粟花”授权转载

甲状腺功能亢进症患者围手术期甲状腺危象风险的系统评价

  97081643411074183

贵州医科大学  麻醉与心脏电生理课题组

翻译:牛振英   编辑:张中伟   审校:曹莹

  01   目的

甲状腺危象是接受手术的甲状腺机能亢进症患者的一种可怕的并发症。我们评估了接受手术的原发性甲状腺功能亢进症患者不同术前治疗方案的甲状腺危象风险。

  02   方法

系统地搜索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,查找关于成年甲亢患者在全麻下接受择期手术的所有研究。选定的研究根据术前治疗进行分类:不治疗、抗甲状腺药物(硫代酰胺)治疗、碘剂治疗、β-受体阻滞剂治疗或联合治疗。如果文献中有报告治疗效果,也就是恢复正常甲状腺功能,则从相关文献中摘录出来。使用非随机化干预研究中的偏倚风险(Robins-I)或随机研究的Cochrane偏倚风险工具来评估偏倚风险。

  03   结果

共检索到7009篇文章,其中有26篇研究发表于1975年至2020年之间,并进行了评估。所有研究都有中度到严重的偏倚风险,主要归因于混淆风险、干预状态的分类和结果的定义。所有研究都报道了甲状腺切除术患者。我们发现没有随机研究比较治疗患者和未治疗患者患甲状腺危象的风险。所有治疗组都报告了甲状腺危象的病例(如果没有明确报告甲状腺危象的发生,但BurcheWartofsky评分中包括相关症状,则计算BurcheWartofsky评分(表1)。BurcheWartofsky评分>45被认为提示甲状腺危象。),描述的发生率从0%到14%不等。

271316434110743406264164341107451719981643411074677

0 4 结论

评估围手术期甲状腺危象风险的证据不充分。考虑到这一并发症的严重性和不可能识别出风险增加的患者,这些患者的术前治疗仍然是有必要的。

  0 5 原始文献来源

De Mul N, et al. Risk of perioperative thyroid storm in hyperthyroid patients: a systematic review[J].Br J Anaesth. 2021 Dec;127(6):879-889.  doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.06.043.  Epub 2021 Aug 11.

英文原文    

Risk of perioperative thyroid storm in hyperthyroid patients: a

systematic review

Abstract

Background: Thyroid storm is a feared complication in patients with hyperthyroidism undergoing surgery. We assessed the risk of thyroid storm for different preoperative treatment options for patients with primary hyperthyroidism undergoing surgery.

Methods: Pubmed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched systematically for all studies reporting on adult hyperthyroid patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Selected studies were categorised based on preoperative treatment: no treatment, antithyroid medication (thionamides), iodine, b-blocking medication, or a combination thereof. Treatment effect, that is restoring euthyroidism, was extracted from the publications if available. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) or the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised studies.

Results: The search yielded 7009 articles, of which 26 studies published between 1975 and 2020 were selected for critical appraisal. All studies had moderate to critical risk of bias, mainly attributable to risk of confounding, classification of intervention status, and definition of the outcome. All studies reported on thyroidectomy patients. We found no randomised studies comparing the risk of thyroid storm between treated and untreated patients. Cases of thyroid storm were reported in all treatment groups with incidences described ranging from 0% to 14%.

Conclusion: Evidence assessing the risk of perioperative thyroid storm is of insufficient quality. Given the seriousness of this complication and the impossibility of identifying patients at increased risk, preoperative treatment of these patients remains warranted.

免责声明:

本微信公众平台所刊载原创或转载内容不代表米勒之声的观点或立场。文中所涉及药物使用、疾病诊疗等内容仅供医学专业人士参考。

END

编辑:MiLiu.米鹭

校对:Michel.米萱

米勒之声编辑部 米勒之声,用心相伴

关注米勒之声

关注麻醉及围术期领域新动态

米勒之声,总有一天,会有您的心声

不感兴趣

看过了

取消

甲状腺危象,手术期,甲状腺,危象,风险,患者,评价,治疗,米勒,研究

不感兴趣

看过了

取消

相关阅读

赞+1

您的申请提交成功

您的申请提交成功

确定 取消
海报

已收到您的咨询诉求 我们会尽快联系您

添加微信客服 快速领取解决方案 您还可以去留言您想解决的问题
去留言
立即提交