SCI护理研究晨读:成人外周静脉导管非感染性并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析
成人外周静脉导管非感染性并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析
成人外周静脉导管非感染性并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析
中文摘要
背景
目的
该系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是总结和量化外周静脉导管相关并发症。
设计
参照Cochrane随机对照试验综合流程实施,并通过流行病学研究中的观察性研究的Meta分析方法报道结果。
数据源
从2000年4月至2019年4月,检索Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,PubMed,CINAHL和EMBASE数据库,临床试验注册中心(例如ClinicalTrials.gov)和纳入研究的参考文献列表。
评价方法
两位研究者使用专门设计的数据提取工具,独立确定待评价、数据提取和质量评估的研究。Freeman-Tukey双反正弦变换后,采用随机效应荟萃分析汇总了二分结果。使用反方差固定效应模型估计异质性。
结果
纳入了70项观察性研究和33项随机对照试验(76,977根导管)。外周静脉导管相关并发症如下:静脉炎(定义)19.3%,静脉炎(未定义)4.5%,浸润/外渗13.7%,闭塞8%,渗漏7.3%,疼痛6.4%,脱位6.0%。亚组分析发现,在经济发达的国家,急诊科插入的导管的渗入/渗出明显高于其他科室插入的导管(25.2%;p = .022),并且与发达地区相比,疼痛明显更高(p <.001)。
结论
外周静脉导管并发症在世界范围内普遍不可接受。这项综述表明,仍需要大量和多专业的努力来解决与并发症相关的不良后果。如果减少并发症,对患者和健康服务的潜在好处是可观的。
影响力
外周静脉并发症使重要的治疗中断,这可能会使患者感到痛苦,并导致住院时间延长,并增加医疗费用。本研究发现静脉炎和浸润是导管失败的最普遍原因。这些结果为护士提供了有力的证据,为制定有效的实践干预措施奠定了基础,这对于预防外周静脉导管患者的不良预后至关重要。
英文摘要
The aim of this systematic review and meta ‐ analysis was tosummarize and quantify peripheral intravenous catheter ‐ relatedcomplications.
Design
This systematic review is reported by meansof the Cochrane process for randomized controlled trials and the Meta‐analysis ofObservation Studies in Epidemiology for cohort studies.
Datasources
The Cochrane Central Register of ControlledTrials, PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE databases, clinical trial registries such asClinicalTrials.gov and the reference list of included studies were searchedfrom 2000 ‐April 2019.
Review Methods
Using a purpose designed data extractiontool, two authors independently identified studies for full review, dataextraction and quality assessment. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled afterFreeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation using random‐effects meta‐analysis;estimates of heterogeneity were taken from inverse‐variance fixed‐effect models.
Results
Seventy observational studies and 33randomized controlled trials were included (76,977 catheters). Peripheralintravenous catheter‐related complications wereas follows: phlebitis (with definition) 19.3%, phlebitis (without definition)4.5%, infiltration/extravasation 13.7%, occlusion 8%, leakage 7.3%, pain 6.4%and dislodgement 6.0%. Subgroup analysis found infiltration/extravasation foremergency department‐inserted catheters wassignificantly higher (25.2%; p = .022)than for those inserted in other departments and pain was significantly higher (p < .001) in countries withdeveloping economies compared with developed economies.
Conclusion
Peripheral intravenous catheter complicationsare unacceptably common worldwide. This review suggests substantial and multi‐specialtyefforts are needed to address the sequalae associated with complications. Thepotential benefits for patients and health services are considerable ifcomplications are reduced.
Impact
Peripheral intravenous complicationsinterrupt important treatment which can be distressing for patients and resultin longer hospital stays with increased healthcare costs. This review foundphlebitis and infiltration are the most prevalent reason for catheter failure.These results provide nurses with a strong evidence base for the development ofeffective interventions for practice which are vital for preventing pooroutcomes for patients with peripheral intravenous catheters.
原文链接:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jan.14565

精彩评论
相关阅读