依托咪酯或丙泊酚对麻醉诱导过程中脑干功能的影响:脑电双频指数指导性研究

2020
08/25

+
分享
评论
米勒之声
A-
A+

本文由“罂粟花”授权转载 

依托咪酯或丙泊酚对麻醉诱导过程中脑干功能的影响脑电双频指数指导性研究

翻译:冯玉蓉  编辑:冯玉蓉  审校:曹莹


目的比较依托咪酯和丙泊酚输注麻醉诱导过程中对血流动力学参数、自主呼吸和角膜反射的影响。


方法80例成患者随机分为两组——在麻醉诱导过程中输注依托咪酯(E组,40)丙泊酚(P组,40)。在整个诱导过程中,监测患者的平均动脉压和心率。记录意识丧失时间(LOC)以及意识丧失时的脑电指数(BIS)是否存在自主呼吸和角膜反射。


结果在麻醉诱导过程中,E组血流动力学参数变化小于P组。与丙泊酚相比,依托咪酯的平均LOC时间更短(129.5 s vs 189.5 s, P<0.0001)LOCE组的BIS低于P(46.3 vs 52.9, P=0.0141)LOCE保留自主呼吸的患者多于P(80% vs 17.5%, P<0.0001)同样,E存在角膜反射的患者多于P(34vs 4例,P<0.0001)。依托咪酯诱发肌阵挛发生率为17.5%


结论:丙泊酚静脉输注相比,依托咪酯输注在麻醉诱导时对患者血流动力学参数的影响较小。输注依托咪酯的患者在LOCBIS值较低,更多的患者存在自主呼吸和角膜反射。


文献来源:Zheng H, Zhu Y, Chen K, et al. The effect of etomidate or propofol on brainstem function during anesthesia induction: a bispectral index-guided study.[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Jun 5;13:1941-1946. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S211523. eCollection 2020.


The effect of etomidate or propofol on brainstem function during anesthesia induction: a bispectral index-guided study

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effect of etomidate versus propofol infusion on hemodynamic profiles, spontaneous breathing, and corneal reflex during the induction of anesthesia.


Methods: Adult patients (n=80) were randomized to receive etomidate (Group E, n=40) or propofol (Group P, n=40) infusion during anesthesia induction. Throughout induction, mean blood pressure and heart rate were monitored. Time to loss of consciousness (LOC), bispectral index (BIS), existence of spontaneous breathing, and corneal reflex at LOC were recorded.


Results: Fewer changes in hemodynamic profile occurred in Group E compared with Group P during induction of anesthesia. The mean time to LOC was shorter with etomidate than propofol (129.5 s vs 189.5 s, P<0.0001). BIS was lower in Group E compared with Group P at LOC (46.3 vs 52.9, P=0.0141). More patients exhibited spontaneous breathing in Group E compared with Group P at LOC (80% vs 17.5%, P<0.0001). Similarly, more patients maintained corneal reflex in Group E compared with Group P (34 patients vs 4 patients, P<0.0001). The incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus was 17.5%.


Conclusion: Compared with propofol infusion, etomidate infusion during anesthesia induction had fewer effects on the hemodynamic profile of patients. Among patients who received etomidate, the BIS value was lower at LOC, and more patients displayed spontaneous breathing and corneal reflex.




 

免责声明:

本平台所刊载原创或转载内容不代表米勒之声的观点或立场。文中所涉及药物使用、疾病诊疗等内容仅供参考。

—     END—    

米勒之声编辑部
米勒之声,用心相伴

本文由作者自行上传,并且作者对本文图文涉及知识产权负全部责任。如有侵权请及时联系(邮箱:guikequan@hmkx.cn
关键词:
丙泊酚,脑电,依托咪酯,麻醉

人点赞

收藏

人收藏

打赏

打赏

我有话说

0条评论

0/500

评论字数超出限制

表情
评论

为你推荐

推荐课程


社群

精彩视频

您的申请提交成功

确定 取消
剩余5
×

打赏金额

认可我就打赏我~

1元 5元 10元 20元 50元 其它

打赏

打赏作者

认可我就打赏我~

×

扫描二维码

立即打赏给Ta吧!

温馨提示:仅支持微信支付!