护理科研之循证护理实践之三---循证实践常见综述方法学比较

循证实践的快速发展和跨学科合作产生了多种综述类型。不同的综述中常使用不用的术语，术语的多样性可能导致使用者对不同综述类型的特征，用法和边界等产生混淆，产生勿用。因此，笔者整理和汇总了循证护理实践中常用的综述类型，并比较了他们的用法、方法学异同及优缺点，帮助读者深入理解和合理运用综述方法。

循证实践常见综述优缺点

由于不同类型综述的适用范围以及优、缺点均有所差异，我们应结合实际的问题与主题，选择合适的综述类型，形成成为规范、科学、严谨的高质量证据，从而更好地开展循证证据总结，指导临床护理实践工作的开展。

（王聪 朱伟）

主要参考文献   [1] Baigent C .Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins.[J].Lancet, 2005, 366. [2] Harker J , Kleijnen J .What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments[J].International Journal of Evidence‐Based Healthcare, 2012, 10(4). [3] O'Flaherty J , Phillips C .The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review[J].Internet & Higher Education, 2015, 25(apr.):85-95. [4] Ejeta L O .Nanoclay/organic filler-reinforced polymeric hybrid composites as promising materials for building, automotive, and construction applications- a state-of-the-art review[J].[2023-07-06]. [5] MagdalenaSafron,AleksandraCislak,TaniaGaspar,et al.Effects of School-based Interventions Targeting Obesity-Related Behaviors and Body Weight Change: A Systematic Umbrella Review[J].Behavioral Medicine, 2011, 37(1):15-25.